IR-2(2)—Incident Response Training | Automated Training Environments
IL4 High
IL5
IL6
>Control Description
Provide an incident response training environment using ⚙organization-defined automated mechanisms.
>DoD Impact Level Requirements
No specific parameter values or requirements for this impact level.
>Discussion
Automated mechanisms can provide a more thorough and realistic incident response training environment. This can be accomplished, for example, by providing more complete coverage of incident response issues, selecting more realistic training scenarios and environments, and stressing the response capability.
>Assessment Interview Topics
Questions assessors commonly ask
Process & Governance:
- •What formal policies and procedures govern the implementation of IR-2(2) (Automated Training Environments)?
- •Who are the designated roles responsible for implementing, maintaining, and monitoring IR-2(2)?
- •How frequently is the IR-2(2) policy reviewed and updated, and what triggers policy changes?
- •What governance structure ensures IR-2(2) requirements are consistently applied across all systems?
Technical Implementation:
- •Describe the specific technical mechanisms or controls used to enforce IR-2(2) requirements.
- •What automated tools, systems, or technologies are deployed to implement IR-2(2)?
- •How is IR-2(2) integrated into your system architecture and overall security posture?
- •What configuration settings, parameters, or technical specifications enforce IR-2(2) requirements?
Evidence & Documentation:
- •What documentation demonstrates the complete implementation of IR-2(2)?
- •What audit logs, records, reports, or monitoring data validate IR-2(2) compliance?
- •Can you provide evidence of periodic reviews, assessments, or testing of IR-2(2) effectiveness?
- •What artifacts would you present during a FedRAMP assessment to demonstrate IR-2(2) compliance?
Ask AI
Configure your API key to use AI features.